Syiok had a blog about "Wi-Fi on the air"
It mentioned that surfing on air will not be free. Now why is it? Why don’t the airlines discourage people from surfing on the Internet? Because probably surfing on board might give rise to potential harm to the passenger. Laptop usage can potentially surf up to neck problems.
http://www.laptopical.com/16651-laptop-health.html
Secondly, I think it is probably very expensive for airlines to bear all cost. Connection is probably enabled through satellite and should airlines push for the idea of free Wi-Fi, they must virtually reserve the bandwidth for as many passenger seats as it may. Means if there are 1000 seats, it will need to assume that 1000 people might need the bandwidth.
So, over here is probably on-demand basis. If you refer syiok, you need to create an access point for it (not sure what it is), and this could be the signal send to Connexion for bandwidth request. So there is a way for on-demand bandwidth.
Now, why not the airlines sponsor these on-demand bandwidth?
Well, maybe they just want to have higher profit margin. And probably this would allow Connexion to earn more because it is dealing with customer directly, there is no need to provide big discount. If airlines were to pay for these bandwidth, they would probably ask for a long-term discount from Connexion as part of the deal. Thus, it is actually WIN WIN for both.
What you guys think?
Just my evaluation.
thanks for visit my tech blog:)
It mentioned that surfing on air will not be free. Now why is it? Why don’t the airlines discourage people from surfing on the Internet? Because probably surfing on board might give rise to potential harm to the passenger. Laptop usage can potentially surf up to neck problems.
http://www.laptopical.com/16651-laptop-health.html
Secondly, I think it is probably very expensive for airlines to bear all cost. Connection is probably enabled through satellite and should airlines push for the idea of free Wi-Fi, they must virtually reserve the bandwidth for as many passenger seats as it may. Means if there are 1000 seats, it will need to assume that 1000 people might need the bandwidth.
So, over here is probably on-demand basis. If you refer syiok, you need to create an access point for it (not sure what it is), and this could be the signal send to Connexion for bandwidth request. So there is a way for on-demand bandwidth.
Now, why not the airlines sponsor these on-demand bandwidth?
Well, maybe they just want to have higher profit margin. And probably this would allow Connexion to earn more because it is dealing with customer directly, there is no need to provide big discount. If airlines were to pay for these bandwidth, they would probably ask for a long-term discount from Connexion as part of the deal. Thus, it is actually WIN WIN for both.
What you guys think?
Just my evaluation.
thanks for visit my tech blog:)

Comments
.
I have a SEO tips site. It pretty much covers optimization
related stuff.
Thanks again and keep up the good work.
Greg
theseo-rank.com
you! If you are interested, go see my
href="http://www.domaincity.ws/BlogSubmitterPro.htm">seo firm related site. Feel free to drop by and tell me what you think.
I have started a blog directory and would like to personally invite you to post your blog. Its free and will help you in your search rankings.
if you have any questions email me at admin@big3post.com and I will get back to you within a 24 hrs.
Keep up the excellent work! and i bookmarked u!
so cant wait for ur next post! :)
Thanks!!
I have a advertising agency campaign internet marketing site/blog. It pretty much covers advertising agency campaign internet marketing related stuff.
Come and check it out if you get time :-)
I have a link reciprocal soccer youth site/blog. It pretty much covers link reciprocal soccer youth related stuff.
Come and check it out if you get time :-)